| 421.5.5: CONCLUSION |
|
| From what
has been discussed above, it should be evident that there
has been a very close contact among the languages belonging
to all the families of India from the Vedic period. As
the Indo-Aryans and the Dravidians had more developed
cultures, it is obvious that their mutual contact will
be stronger and more varied than that with the other stocks.
However, the contact among different families had increased
continuously leading to extreme convergence in some cases.
Resultantly, the languages which were quite different
lexically and structurally earlier have become so similar
now. |
|
| NOTE |
|
| In this
paper [T, Th, D, Dh, R, L, S ] have been used for the
voiceless unaspirated retroflex stop, the voiceless aspirated
retroflex stop, the voiced unaspirated retroflex stop,
the voiced aspirated retroflex stop, the unaspirated retroflex
flap, the retroflex nasal, and the retroflex lateral,
repectively. Then [E] has been for the half-open unrounded
front vowel. |
|
| 421.5.6: REFERENCES |
|
- Andronov, M.S. 1977. Dravidian languages. Vijayawada:
Visalandhra Publishing House.
- Bhattacharya, S. 1966. Some Munda etymologies. In:
Studies in Comparative Austroasiatic Linguistics ed.
by N.H. Zide. The Hague: Mouton.
- -------. 1975. Studies in Comparative Munda linguistics.
Simla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study.
- Burrow, T. and M.B. Emeneau. 1984. A Dravidian etymological
Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press (2nd edition).
- Caldwell, R. 1976. A comparative grammar of the
Drividian or South Indian family of languages. Madras:
University of Madras (reprinted).
- Chatterji, S.K. 1970. The origin and development
of the Bengali Language. London: George Allen & Unwin
(reprint).
- Deshpande, M.M. and P.E. Hook (eds.). 1979. Aryan
and non-Aryan in India. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
- Emeneau, M.B. 1956. India as a linguistic area.
Language 32:1, 3- 16.
- ----------. 1980. Language and linguistic area.
(Essays selected by A.S. Dil). Standford: Stanford
University Press.
- ----------. And T. Burrow. 1962. Dravidian borrowing
from Indo-Aryan. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University
of California.
- Jakobson, R. 1931. ?ber die phonologischen Sprachhnde.
Travaux Du Cercle Linguist gue de Prague 4:234-40.
- Kuiper, F.B.J. 1948. Proto-Munda words in Sanskrit.
Amsterdam: Verhandeling der Koninklijne Nederlandsche
Academie van Wetenschappen.
- -----------. 1967. The genesis of a linguistic area.
Indo-Iranian Journal 10:81-102.
- Masica, C.P. 1976. Defining a linguistic area: South
Asia. Chicago, London: University of Chicago.
- Sin, N.M. 1981. Some mutual borrowings in Indo-Aryan
and Indo- Tibetan. In: Suniti Kumar Chatterji Commemoration
Volume. Burdwan: University of Burdwan.
- Subrahmanyam, P.S. 1984. Common Vocabulary in Dravidian.
In: Seminar Papers in Common Core Vocabulary in Indian
Languages ed. by M. Ramappa. Hyderabad: International
Telugu Institute.
- Velten, H.V. 1943. The Nez Perce verb. Pacific Northwest
Quarterly 34:271-292.
- Zograph, G.A. 1982. Languages of South Asia (tr.
By G.L. Campbell). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Zvelebil, K.V. 1990. Dravidian linguistics: an introduction.
Pondicherry: Pondicherry Institute of Linguistics
and Culture.
|
|
| Task |
|
- Collect words for fifty basic vocabulary items like
names of body-parts, pet animals, kinship terms, lower
order numerals and another fifty cultural vocabulary
items from at least three languages belonging to different
languages families of India. Do you notice any similarities
among them? If yes, then in what kind of vocabulary
and why?
- Take data on two syntactic constructions like relative
clauses, complements, absolutives from at least three
languages belonging to different language families
of India and see whether they are similar or different.
In case, they are similar assume that originally one
of the languages possessed each construction and the
other two have converged with it, and try to find
out which language possessed it originally.
|
|
| REVIEW QUESTIONS |
|
- Discuss in detail the Dravidian influence on Indo-Aryan
languages.
- What do you mean by translation area? Discuss in
detail why South Asia is considered a translation
area.
|
|
Dr. Pachanan Mohanty
University of Hyderabad |
|
|